Nama Kelompok 11
1. Lia Khoirunnisa
2. Masitoh Sjari R.A
3. Zulfah Qadariyah
Question :
1.
What are the ethical issues raised by
this case?
2.
What is the legal doctrine of
"limited liability" apply to protect shareholders of Union Carbide
Corporation (U.S.)?
3.
Were the Indian operations, which were
being overseen by the managers of Union Carbide Corporation (U.S.), in
compliance with legal or moral or ethical standards?
Answer :
1.
In 1984 Bhopal tragedy , ragedy is the
worst industrial disaster in History Of The World. That causes no spending 40
metric tons of methyl isocyanate ( MIC ) IN unintentionally From Union Carbide
pesticide plant located in the city of Bhopal, in gatra Madhya Pradesh in India
. The investigation carried out stating that some other Safety Step is NOT
executed and standard operation in the plant does not comply with standards in
the Union Carbide plant . Ethical issues of this case regarding environmental
negligence and responsibility which has resulted in many casualties of
poisonous methyl isocyanate gas leak from the Union Carbide pesticide plant.
2.
The legal doctrine does not apply to
protect the shareholders, but the disadvantage of Shareholders , causing
outrage from shareholders as a result of Losses suffered. In addition that
reportedly Union Carbide in Bhopal Have Lost Money for several years . But
before this tragedy, the Indian company has been doing ltindakan In Effort to
Overcome review of Annual Losses of $ 4 million .
3.
Is not appropriate because the company
Union Carbide India Ltd. has not met the legal and ethical standards set by the
parent company. Therefore, many incident - unexpected incident occur in the
plant as a result of employee negligence and lack of training provided and
because most of the employees are illiterate and do not know the dangers of
chemical pesticides are used so that they mix the water into tanks containing
methyl isocyanate causing many toxic gases.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar